ah
2010-08-11 02:32:15 UTC
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.steveleyland
3568> That's a .sig, Tholen.
It's a .sig that is inconsistent with the attribution line, ah.
Of course, you would know that by now if you had better reading
comprehension skills, ah.
Classic reading and writing comprehension deficit.3568> That's a .sig, Tholen.
It's a .sig that is inconsistent with the attribution line, ah.
Of course, you would know that by now if you had better reading
comprehension skills, ah.
You admit to Peggy Scissons' traditional use of 'Smee' as her personal EOF
being a .sig, tholen, thus highlighting one mis-use of an adjective, and two
erroneous presuppositions (on your part):
a) the use of 'inconsistent'. Which of "Not regular or predictable; erratic",
"Lacking in correct logical relation; contradictory" or "Not in agreement or
harmony; incompatible" did you consider applicable to your /inappropriate/ use
of 'inconsistent' in this particular instance?
b) that the 'Smee' is inconsistent. It is obvious to anyone with some degree
of reading comprehension that the 'Smee' is quite consistent. Has been, and
probably always will be.
3568> No surprise there, really.
What does your lack of surprise regarding your reading
comprehension problem have to do with OS/2, ah?
Classic projection laced with IKYABWAI.What does your lack of surprise regarding your reading
comprehension problem have to do with OS/2, ah?
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.usenet.kooks
3569> You'll not be warned again.
What does your intention have to do with OS/2, ah?
Classic boilerplate, tholen.3569> You'll not be warned again.
What does your intention have to do with OS/2, ah?
--
a h
a h